понедельник, 30 сентября 2013 г.

Rinat Galyautdinov: Samsung's ChatOn IM service hits 100M users


ChatOn, Samsung's mobile messaging platform, doubled the size of its user base in the past four months, now tallying more than 100 million registered users.
Preinstalled on Samsung's feature phones and smartphones running both Android and the company's own Bada mobile OS, the cross-platform client is also available as a free download for other mobile platforms, including Apple's iOS and RIM's BlackBerry.
While available in 237 different countries and 63 languages, ChatOn has experienced steady growth in India, China, and the US and is growing in popularity in Europe and the Middle East, Samsung said in a statement Sunday.
Launched in October 2011, ChatOn is part of a market of multi-platform IM tools that have moved into the realm of social networking. One of the bigger players in the sector is WhatsApp, a 4-year-old platform that has garnered more than 300 million users in more than 250 countries.
It may face increased competition from BlackBerry's Messenger service as well. Once an exclusive to BlackBerry users, the struggling handset maker's BBM service was recently made available to Android and iOS users.

Rinat Galyautdinov: SpaceX launches Falcon 9 rocket, its largest to date


SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket lifting off from Vandenburg Air Force Base on Sunday.
(Credit: SpaceX)
SpaceX launched its most powerful rocket to date on Sunday, a booster the company hopes will one day ferry astronauts to the International Space Station.
The nine-engine Falcon 9 lifted off from Vandenberg Air Force Base, about 150 miles northwest of Los Angeles, at 9 a.m. PT, carrying a Canadian science satellite for placement in orbit. The 224-foot-tall rocket features a longer first stage and triple redundant flight computers. Sunday's launch was the first Falcon 9 mission to use a payload fairing to encapsulate the satellite.
"Launch was good," SpaceX founder and CEO Elon Musk said in a tweet Sunday. "All satellites deployed at the targeted orbit insertion vectors."
The Falcon 9 was launched from a mothballed launch pad formerly used by the Air Force's Titan 4 heavy-lift rocket after undergoing nearly $100 million in modifications.
The rocket delivered to orbit Canada's 1,100-pound Cassiope space weather satellite, which will be used to gather data on space storms in Earth's upper atmosphere and assess their potential impacts radio communications, GPS navigation, and other technologies.
Musk, who co-founded PayPal and sold it to eBay for $1.5 billion in 2002, co-founded SpaceX that same year and secured a $1.6 billion contract with NASA to provide 12 cargo flights to to deliver equipment and supplies to the International Space Station.

Rinat Galyautdinov : Pioneer SP-SB23W


Pioneer SP-SB23W
Scroll RightScroll Left
  • Pioneer SP-SB23W
  • Asus RT-AC68U Dual-band Wireless-AC1900 Gigabit Router
  • FIFA 14
  • Quickoffice for Android
  • PicPlayPost for iOS
  • Angry Birds Star Wars II
  • Panasonic NN-SD997S microwave
  • Kindle Paperwhite
  • Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR
  • Sharp R820JS Convection Grill Microwave Oven
  • Whirlpool WMC50522AS Microwave
  • Asus Memo Pad FHD 10
  • 2014 Chevrolet Spark EV
  • Amana AMC2166AS countertop microwave
  • Sony Alpha A3000
  • LG Optimus F6
If variety is the spice of life, CNET's band of jolly editors really filled the spice rack this week. In addition to tortured metaphors in introductions to slideshows, this week saw a rocking (and affordable) sound bar, an impressive router (no, really), a large tablet that won't nuke your wallet, and a "surprisingly powerful" electric car. First up:
Pioneer SP-SB23W
The Pioneer SP-SB23W is the best affordable sound bar if you care about sound quality, with its outstanding sonics making up for some of its design limitations. Read the review.

Rinat Galyautdinov: Executive infighting reportedly led to BlackBerry's downfall


BlackBerry CEO Thorsten Heins.
BlackBerry CEO Thorsten Heins didn't always see eye to eye with other executives over company strategy.
(Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET)
In the end, BlackBerry's leadership may have been its own worst enemy.
The struggling handset maker suffered from infighting at its executive level that hobbled its ability to compete in the mobile market and led to its eventual downfall, according to an investigation conducted by the The Globe and Mail newspaper.
The company, which plans to cut roughly 40 percent of its staff and sell itself to an investment group, announced Friday that it lost $965 million last year. The biggest reason for the dramatic loss was the $934 million write-down the company took on inventory of the BlackBerry Z10, which apparently did not sell well.
The Z10 was a departure from the company's famous keyboard-equipped mobile phone and BlackBerry CEO Thorsten Heins' best weapon to compete with the glass touch-screen handsets sold by Apple and Samsung. While the Z10 was designed to showcase the next-generation BlackBerry 10 operating system, it had one major detractor, according to sources interviewed by the newspaper: company co-founder Michael Lazardis.
During a meeting last year with the company's board to review plans to launch the new device, a frustrated Lazardis voiced concerns that the company's new direction was an abandonment of his vision that made BlackBerry handsets popular with corporate customers.
"I get this," Lazardis said, pointing to one of the company's signature devices. "It's clearly differentiated." Then he pointed to a touch-screen phone. "I don't get this."
Once the preferred handset maker among the corporate elite, BlackBerry was hurt by its inability to move past the legacy operating system that got it into the smartphone game and quickly fell behind Apple's iPhone and Google's Android operating system. After hitting a high of nearly $145 in 2008, the company's stock lost a staggering 94 percent of its value. On Monday the company announced that it had entered into a deal to sell itself a consortium led by Fairfax Financial Holdings that valued the company at $4.7 billion.
Months before the boardroom confrontation between Heins and Lazardis, the pair was in another showdown, this time with Jim Balsillie, who was co-CEO of BlackBerry when it was still known as Research In Motion. Balsillie championed a strategy to license the company's BlackBerry Messenger (BBM) instant messaging platform to competitors.
Getting BBM onto millions of non-BlackBerry handsets was expected to generate a handsome profit for the company, but the plan ran into stiff opposition from senior executives. Not long afterbeing appointed chief executive of RIM last year, Heins decided to ditch plans to license BBM -- with Lazardis' support, according to the newspaper.
As a result, Balsillie resigned from the board and severed his ties to the company, he confirmed to the newspaper.
"My reason for leaving the RIM board in March, 2012, was due to the company's decision to cancel the BBM cross-platform strategy," Balsillie said in a brief statement to The Globe and Mail.
CNET has contacted BlackBerry for comment and will update this report when we learn more.

Rinat Galyautdinov: Why the NFL made Twitter its first social draft pick


The National Football League doesn't like to share -- at least when it comes to the content it licenses to television networks for billions of dollars each year. But for the first time ever, the organization has partnered with a social network to share, in its own terms, "some of the most valuable content in the entertainment business."
The social network in question is Twitter, and the arrangement is such that the NFL will program special video clips that will be delivered as Promoted Tweets through the organization's official Twitter handle. Those video clips will include near-instant replays from Thursday night games, Sunday post-game highlights, analysis, news, and fantasy football advice. Videos will be appended with pre-roll, 5- to 8-second advertisements from Verizon and another unnamed sponsor. Twitter and the NFL will share advertising, though the exact terms of the arrangement are unknown.
(Credit: NFL)
For Twitter, the deal means additional revenue in the lead up to its public offering. It also, perhaps equally important, gives the company a coveted asset that its competitors, Facebook in particular, won't have. The other social network has five times the active users and has been aggressively working its way into television and the real-time realm with hashtags, embedded posts, trending topics, and a public feed-sharing partnership with Mass Relevance.
So, why Twitter?
"Because of the nature of their platform, of being open publicly and real time ... and really seeing a synergist experience ... we thought this was a great way to start off with something deep with a social partner," Hans Schroeder, senior vice president of media strategy and development for the NFL, told CNET.
The NFL and Twitter have had an ongoing relationship for years, but conversations about an advertising partnership got serious over the summer, he said, and then moved swiftly. Verizon, the football organization's partner on NFL mobile and the exclusive distributor of live games to smartphones, was game to extend its arrangement with the NFL to run Twitter-sized spots.
"[Twitter] came with a much more robust appreciation for what their distribution could mean for content owners like ourselves," Schroeder said. "For us, one of the real attractive things about this partnership ... is the ability to take our content and use their ability to promote within their distribution network, and make sure a number much larger than 5 million people see this content and become more aware of the conversation around the NFL that happens today."
The NFL has about 5 million followers on Twitter, but the organization eyes the larger potential in the crossover between the 190 million NFL fans in the US and the 100 million people or so who use Twitter stateside, Schroeder said. The NFL really wants broad appeal, he added, and plans to expose its Twitter-specific content to casual and enthusiast sports fans alike.
The promoted tweets, which started Thursday morning with a pregame analysis video released ahead of the evening's football match up, will vary in appeal. Because of complicated licensing agreements, the NFL will only put out in-progress game highlights for the Thursday night games, which air on its own network. Still, Schroeder anticipates that the effort will boost television ratings and bring in new viewers.
"When we tweet out a highlight as it happens and somebody sees that in that Twitter feed, we definitely think it will lead to incremental viewership," he said. "We think ... even on Sundays, when we put out highlights after the game, that it will drive more people back to the television."

Rinat Galyautdinov: Author pleads


Clarke -- who also published the novel "We're So Famous," edited and co-edited a number of other titles and was a founding editor of the Boston College-published literary magazine Post Road -- is co-owner of an independent bookstore in Boston called Newtonville Books.
"As a bookstore owner, I see small presses come and go -- they usually publish a book or two and then fold after running out of money," Clarke writes. "For many small publishers like Roundabout, Amazon accounts for a large portion of sales, but the publisher realizes very little of the purchase price owing to Amazon's discounting policies."
"Vernon Downs" is published by Roundabout Press, from whichreaders can preorder the book online. Any royalties on sales received from preordering the book now from Roundabout will go directly to the publisher, Clarke said. In addition, anyone who buys the book from Roundabout can get it shipped to them in December. Amazon can't start selling the book until next April, according to Clark, after "Vernon Downs" has gone through the publishing process to get an official bar code.
We've reached out to Amazon for comment and will update this post when we hear back.
The author's move is just one more chapter in the "Amazon vs. small businesses" battle that has expanded especially with regard to books. In July, US District Court Judge Denise Cote ruled that Apple had conspired with five of the largest publishing companies in the US to fix e-book prices. Resting upon the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, the decision has all but secured Amazon's position as the largest and most successful bookseller for years to come.
Despite the fact that independent bookstores have been making a steady comeback as small businesses rebound in the strengthening economy, three independent East Coast bookstores have filed suit against Amazon and major publishers in an attempt to level the playing field. President Barack Obama even got pulled into the debate after New England Independent Booksellers Association Director Steve Fischer late last month condemned the president for visiting an Amazon warehouse in the wake of the Apple e-book decision.
In an interview with CNET on Friday, Clarke laid out his reasoning for why readers should shift support towards independent publishers -- even it if it means slightly higher prices -- and the current issues authors, publishers, and booksellers face in the rising e-book and Amazon era. The following is an edited version of that conversation.
Q: Why would you urge people not to buy books, or at least your book, from Amazon? Is it simply that people should not buy books published from independent publishers on Amazon, or that people should avoid all book buying on Amazon because of what you think it's done to the industry?
Clarke: My campaign to urge interested readers to purchase my novel "Vernon Downs" directly from the publisher is mostly economical, which is to say small, independent publishers like Roundabout Press need all the capital they can lay their hands on.
Unfortunately, most indie publishers rely on Amazon to sell their books, and to quote F. Scott Fitzgerald, the price is high. Indie publishers realize a fraction of the purchase price and are at the mercy of Amazon's discounting policies. As a bookstore owner, my obvious preference is that readers buy books at bookstores, but I know a lot of readers don't live in proximity to a bookstore.
Given Amazon's dominance, where do you see both the e-book market and physical book selling at large in five years time?
Clarke: Industry numbers have borne out what I suspect all along: The e-book market is the new audio book market. E-books are settling to be about 20 percent of the book market, which is what audio books were in the '80s and early '90s.
"Most indie publishers rely on Amazon to sell their books, and to quote F. Scott Fitzgerald, the price is high."
I actually think e-books might be creating new readers, which isn't a bad thing. But people who love books, love books. And books have been around for 500 years. A bigger threat is whether or not the current generation values the book. They'll be around, but will they be read?
What will happen to independent publishers and bookstores as Amazon's hold continues to solidify?
Clarke: Amazon has done all it's going to do to the industry, I think. It's interesting that Amazon's early ambitions were to be the Walmart of the Internet. Books were incidental to their plans -- books just happened to be sitting in warehouses across the country ready to be shipped. It could easily have been lawn furniture.
Now that Amazon is the Walmart of the Internet, it's clear they want to take on technology service providers like Apple. They seem to be hanging around books and publishing mostly out of spite.
Recent reports are saying that independent bookstores are thriving even in the age of Amazon. Do you find this to be true in your own experience with Newtonville Books, and if it is indeed true, what do you think are the causes of the uptick in interest?
Clarke: My wife and I bought Newtonville Books in 2007, just before the economy collapsed. A number of stores were shed and, in fact, we bought Newtonville because it was going to close.
It's true that the number of new bookstores has increased in the last couple of years, which is likely owing to the improving economy. I think any community that is so inclined can support a small, independent bookstore. The big, warehouse bookstore with deep discounts (for instance, Borders and Barnes & Noble) are dinosaurs and are frankly just trying to replicate physically the Amazon experience.
But if having a neighborhood bookstore is important to the neighborhood, it can be done. Even if it means only buying half your books on Amazon, or one in three. I recently heard [Amazon CEO] Jeff Bezos bragging about how Amazon is a customer-centric company, meaning he doesn't listen to all the criticism about Amazon's shoddy corporate policies, etc. All is in service to giving the customer the lowest price, fast and easy.
"[If] having a neighborhood bookstore is important to the neighborhood, it can be done. Even if means only buying half your books on Amazon."
But I'd argue it's not that customer-centric, especially if the customer's house catches on fire and the fire department can't come because the customer bought all their stuff on Amazon without paying sales tax. Or the customer's kids have to be bused an hour away because the local school had to close because of the loss of tax revenue on all those Amazon sales -- on down the line.
Some individuals claim that Amazon's self-publishing and digital selling tools have removed the barriers for young and upcoming writers to get published. Is this accurate in your eyes?
Clarke: I don't have a lot of experience with that side of Amazon. I'm a populist by nature and so I'm against barriers, especially as it relates to art. Amazon is a marketplace and their terrible corporate policies notwithstanding, they're likely providing a valuable service to the little store in Iowa who has something on their shelves that a customer in New Mexico is desperate for.
That may be true, too, for self-publishing. If so, great. I'm sure all the advantages are really on Amazon's side of the transaction, though. They've never shown themselves to be concerned with art or art-making. Just money.
What is the benefit to literature in having both independent and large publishing houses to help curate and assign value to creative works?
I worked in publishing in the late 1990s and know firsthand that like any big business, publishing is mostly guessing. It drives aspiring authors crazy, but books are mostly published based on the passions of a few people, i.e., the author, the author's agent, and the author's editor.
Though in the last decade or so that circle has widened to include marketing people and others at the publishing house, I suspect. I think that's why there are more and more independent publishers springing up.
What makes the publishing industry different in your opinion from other the institutions around other creative media like music? 
Clarke: The music and movie industries have undergone a dramatic digital revolution, and while the early going was rough, it seems like those industries are adapting well. The difference for books is simply it's a printed medium.
"As a society we have respect for reading so much so that we disparage reading things on our computers as a matter of rote."
We listen to music and don't really care what the delivery system is. Same for movies. We sit and stare but don't really care which format we're staring at. But inherent in the book is the idea of reading, and as a society we have respect for reading so much so that we disparage reading things on our computers as a matter of rote.
We imbue reading with seriousness and revere "People Who Read," which conjures the image of someone spending time with a book. As I say, that reverence could be in jeopardy with the current generation, but we'll have to wait to see.

воскресенье, 29 сентября 2013 г.

Rinat Galyautdinov, Sowing the Seeds for Space-Based Agriculture – Part 2


In today’s A Lab Aloft, Charlie Quincy, research advisor to the International Space Station Ground Processing and Research director at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida, continues to share the growing potential of plants in space and the new plant habitat that will help guide researchers.
As astronauts continue to move away from Earth, our ties back to our planet are going to be strained. We won’t have the capability to jump into a return capsule and be back to Earth in 90 minutes.
To move further away from Earth, we have to continue to develop more autonomous systems in our spacecraft that supply our fundamental needs for oxygen production and carbon dioxide (CO2) removal, clean water and food. The genetic coding in plants to perform these functions has been refined and improved for the past 3-4 billion years as plants have continually evolved on Earth. So the code is pretty good. As long as we can provide biological organisms like plants or algae with the nutrients and support systems they need, they will pretty much know what to do. What they will do is clean water, change CO2 into oxygen and generate food. From a life support system, that’s kind of what you want to happen.
There are some interesting things about plants that we’ll have to deal with in space. For instance, we don’t have bumblebees in orbit, so who does the pollination? Who goes from flower to flower? We’ve actually had astronauts using cotton swabs to move pollen from one flower to another, in particular when we were growing strawberries a few years back. As we get more and more into it, we need to figure out how to do this without using the crew, since it would not be efficient to have them pollinating a field with cotton swabs.
Plant Blog B_1View of willow trees in an Advanced Biological Research System (ABRS) incubator for the Advanced Plant Experiments on Orbit – Cambium (APEX-Cambium) experiment aboard the International Space Station during Expedition 21. (NASA)
We have quite a number of things going on and coming to fruition on the International Space Station. We currently have a small habitat called the Advanced Biological Research System (ABRS) in orbit performing fundamental studies of plant growth in the microgravity environment. It has two independent chambers that are tightly controlled and have LED lights. We can manage moisture delivery, CO2 and trace gases inside those chambers and do some real hard science investigations. The Russian segment has a habitat, too, called the Lada greenhouse.
The Advanced Plant Habitat (APH) is a similar chamber under development, but that one will be larger. The APH will enable us to use larger plants and different species, all of which will be tightly controlled during growth investigations.
Another really exciting new system launching to the space station probably around the middle of next year is the Vegetable Production System (Veggie). It will begin bridging the gap between a pure science facility and a food production system. We are in the ground testing phase of the flight unit to assure it is safe for operation aboard the station with the help of the facility’s builder, Orbital Technologies Corporation of Madison, Wis. Orbitec. They also will manufacture the APH.
The beauty of the Veggie unit is that it’s really just a light canopy with a fan and a watering mat for growing plants, using the cabin atmosphere aboard the space station. The crew will have an opportunity to farm about two and a half square feet, which is a pretty good sized growing area. This system also has great potential as a platform for educational programs at the high school level, where students could grow the same plants in similar systems in their classrooms.
Plant Blog B_2